Macfuse: Fuse For Mac
How to completely remove Fuse for Mac OS X NTFS-3G. Uninstalling NTFS-3G and MacFUSE after upgrading from Yosemite to El Capitan. NTFS partition on external HD not recognized or mounted on El Capitan or Sierra, even with latest Paragon or Tuxera. Hot Network Questions. Furthermore, i realize that this forum is for Linux, but it might help a Mac user as i invariably fell onto that page after googling 'uninstall MacFuse' so if an other Mac user reads this it could help them - (might also be the same principle in the Linux system somewhere in your sys preferences' - (Don't know use Linux, can't be more specific)). While newer versions of the Mac operating system support NTFS without any third party add-ons, older versions of OS X may still find value in MacFUSE. Keep in mind that if you’re in OS X 10.7, 10.8, 10.9 or newer – this is not necessary, and thus this article is really only relevant for much older versions of Mac OS X before 10.5.
(FUSE) has long been one of my favorite features on Linux systems. Using FUSE modules, you can mount all sorts of innovative resources - Gmail, your Flickr photos, a remote SSH server - directly into your local machine's filesystem and use their contents exactly as if they were normal files. Now you can do the same thing on Mac OS X, courtesy of. FUSE has never been limited to Linux, of course - FreeBSD for years. And it is OS X's BSD compatibility that enabled Google engineer Amit Singh to write the FUSE kernel extension and library he released in January.
At the MacFUSE project home page, you will find for the core MacFUSE utility and two FUSE filesystem modules: SpotlightFS and sshfs. The newest release of MacFUSE Core is 0.4.0, but for right now, I recommend that you download the previous release. Version 0.4.0 is too new to work with the user-friendly utilities you need to get started - including the SpotlightFS 0.1.0 and sshfs 0.3.0 packages. You can get to MacFUSE Core 0.3.0 through the Downloads tab at the MacFUSE page.
The pull-down menu starts off set to Current Downloads - select either or to see the older releases. Understanding FUSE: what it is, what it isn't The last time I wrote, a few commenters commented that fish:// in KDE's Konqueror browser and ssh:// in GNOME's Nautilus do the same thing: connect you locally to files on a remote SSH server. Both of those apps merely open up an SSH connection to the remote machine and transfer whole files back and forth, letting you work on a temporary local copy and then uploading the new version back to the remote machine. With FUSE, the remote share is mounted in your local filesystem - the remote files are connected live to your local system.
When you open a file, you are opening, reading, and working on the original, remote copy itself, not a temporary duplicate moved back and forth. The ability to work on original files remotely is why network file systems like NFS and SMB were created and remain popular to this day. There are many things you can do with them that you can't do by repeatedly copying a file back and forth.
You can tail the contents of a remote log file. You can edit a file on your local machine and, in the event of a crash, only lose the changes made since your last save. And you can connect to the same share from multiple locations without having to worry about resyncing every client.
To get the most out of MacFUSE, you need to understand the difference between FUSE itself and the various FUSE filesystems. If it is not clear, you can get lost in all the terminology. In a nutshell, FUSE is an application program interface (API). When you install the MacFUSE Core package, you are installing OS X system hooks to the FUSE API.
To add any particular filesystem module (such as sshfs) requires installing its own package. The sshfs and SpotlightFS installers at the MacFUSE project are two such packages; MacFusion provides more of its own. Filesystems galore! With MacFUSE Core installed, you can compile most existing FUSE filesystems from source. If you intend to take that route, be sure to scour the on the project's wiki for hints before you start. For everyone else, the project-supplied SpotlightFS and sshfs packages are a simpler alternative.
SpotlightFS exploits features unique to OS X. It allows you to access that operating system's Spotlight integrated search capabilities as though they were part of the standard Mac filesystem. That means you can navigate to a SpotlightFS/foo folder from within any application and have instant access to all files and directories that turn up in a Spotlight search for foo. As interesting as that is, I find sshfs considerably more useful on a daily basis. It works exactly like it does under Linux; you can use it to connect to any remote machine over SSH: other Macs, Linux PCs, even Web servers at paid hosting facilities. It is far easier to transfer files back and forth with drag-and-drop than with an FTP client, and far easier to manage and edit configuration files when you don't have to worry about synchronizing multiple copies.
The MacFusion shortcut The MacFUSE project's sshfs installer installs both an sshfs module and a simple GUI front end with which you can mount and unmount remote SSH servers. The downside of this front end is that it isn't 'supported' - meaning in this case that when it doesn't work, you are out of luck.
A better solution is, an open source app designed to work with MacFUSE, but which is maintained by other developers. You can download an installer image from its. The latest version is 1.1.
MacFusion runs as a 'menu extra' - an icon in the top menu bar. It comes bundled with modules for sshfs and CurlFtpFS (for connecting to FTP servers).
To connect, all you do is click on the MacFusion icon, move down to Quick Mount, and select FTP or SSH as appropriate. In the resulting pop-up dialog, you enter the address of the server you are connecting to, the username to connect with, and any optional details (such as starting directory). MacFusion will prompt you for a password, which you can optionally store in Keychain for faster access in the future.
Macfuse: Fuse For Mac Free
Mounted servers appear in the Finder as network disks. They can be browsed, searched, and used just like any external drive. To disconnect, you just click on the Eject icon in Finder. MacFusion lets you store a list of favorite servers, and can check for updated versions of its software automatically. Since the development of MacFUSE and MacFusion is not coordinated, you sometimes have to wait for both packages to be updated before reaping the benefits of new features.
Such is the case right now, as MacFUSE 0.4.0 added support for custom volume icons (which look really cool), while MacFusion has yet to release an update that takes advantage of them. Still, all things considered, that is a pretty minor inconvenience. MacFUSE and MacFusion together are simple, fast, and convenient. SSH-encrypted access to remote servers, transparently available to all applications? What more could you ask? Categories:.
Networking. Desktop Software. Apple & Macintosh.
A MacFUSE-Based Process File System for Mac OS X © Amit Singh. All Rights Reserved. Written in May 2007 Processes as Files The process file system ('procfs' for brevity, or simply '/proc', because that's where it is usually mounted) has become a common entity on Unix-like systems.
For example, Solaris, Linux, and the various modern BSDs all have procfs. In general, procfs uses the file metaphor to provide both a view of currently running processes and perhaps an interface to control them. However, some procfs implementations export so many types of information that they are nothing short of the proverbial kitchen sink. Implementations can also differ in the format they use to export such information. For example, Solaris procfs favors the binary format philosophy, assuming that developers will write interesting user-space tools that use that 'raw' information. In contrast, Linux favors formatted text to export information through procfs, allowing end users and administrators to simply view that information using familiar file utilities.
Killian created the first implementation of a process file system. It was for Eighth Edition UNIX. Killian, 'Processes as Files,' USENIX Summer Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, USA (June 1984).
/proc on Mac OS X (not) Mac OS X does not provide a process file system. It does provide alternative interfaces such as sysctl(3) and the now obsolete kvm(3). The sysctl(3) interface provides read and write access to a management information base (MIB) whose contents are various categories of kernel information, such as information related to processes, file systems, virtual memory, networking, and debugging in general.
When the /dev/kmem device is available, the kvm(3) interface provides access to raw kernel memory. Besides, the I/O Kit programming interfaces and tools such as ioreg and IORegistryExplorer.app allow user-space inspection of a variety of kernel information on Mac OS X. The sysctl system call was introduced in 4.4BSD as a safe, reliable, and portable (across kernel versions) way to perform user-kernel data exchange. In 2003, shortly after I was introduced to Mac OS X, I began a quick-and-dirty implementation of procfs for Mac OS X. Meant as nothing more than a 'random experiment', my approach was to take procfs and pseudofs source from FreeBSD and morph them to work on Mac OS X. Shortly after I had the thing mounting, I ran into a kernel panic.
Macfuse: Fuse For Mac Pro
(Writing in-kernel file systems is very conducive to this behavior.) Before I could begin two-machine debugging, one of the two Macintosh computers I had access to had catastrophic hardware failure. Apple gave me extremely poor repair experience (taking weeks to fix one problem and returning the machine with something else broken; repeat this several times over). So much so that by the time the machine finally worked, I had no interest left in debugging procfs for Mac OS X.
A MacFUSE-Based procfs Fast forward to late 2006. I was wrapping up, a Mac OS X implementation of the FUSE ( File System in User Space) mechanism. The first Mac OS X-specific example file system I wrote for MacFUSE was procfs—this time as a user-space file system, of course. I've been meaning to release it as an open source MacFUSE example, but didn't find the time to package it up until now. The MacFUSE version of procfs makes heavy use of the Mach programming interfaces. Moreover, the implementation uses a set of macros that depend on the C version of the (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions) library. The macros are meant to make it easier to extend the file system.
Detailed information on understanding and using the Mach interfaces used by procfs can be found in the book. In particular, refer to Chapters 6 (The xnu Kernel), 7 (Processes), 8 (Virtual Memory), and 9 (Interprocess Communication). Compiling and Using procfs Since procfs depends on the libraries, you will first need to download, compile, and install pcre. Note that if you install pcre in a location other than /usr/local/, you will need to modify the Makefile in procfs source. The Makefile also assumes that you have the MacFUSE libraries installed under /usr/local/. $ tar -jxvf pcre.tar.bz2.
$ cd pcre- $ CFLAGS='-O -g -arch i386 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk' CXXFLAGS='-O -g -arch i386 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk' LDFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch ppc'./configure -prefix=/usr/local -disable-dependency-tracking $ make $ sudo make install. Assuming you have the installed and have the checked out under /work/macfuse/, you can compile procfs as follows. $ cd /work/macfuse/filesystems/procfs $ make. Having successfully compiled procfs, you can mount it, say, on the /proc directory, as follows. $ sudo mkdir /proc $ sudo chown root:wheel /proc $ sudo./procfs /proc $ mount. Procfs on /proc (read-only, synchronous) Now you can explore the process file system on Mac OS X. $ ls -F /proc 0/ 151/ 212/ 35/ 47/ 1/ 165/ 215/ 36/ 51/ 1166/ 187/ 218/ 38/ 5338/ 1187/ 194/ 221/ 39/ 54/ 1196/ 195/ 23/ 3954/ 59/ 1216/ 196/ 27/ 3976/ 62/ 131/ 200/ 28807/ 40/ 64/ 140/ 201/ 28902/ 42/ 67/ 145/ 202/ 32/ 43/ 867/ 146/ 204/ 33/ 45/ 95/ 15094/ 206/ 34/ 46/ hardware/ There is a directory under /proc for each process on the system, with the numeric process ID (pid) being the directory name.
Pid 0 corresponds to the kernel, pid 1 is launchd, and so on. $ cd /proc/867 $ ls -l total 0 0 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 May 7 23:44. 0 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 May 7 23:44. In a subsequent version of procfs, the /hardware/ subdirectory was moved to appear under the /system/ subdirectory, which in turn now contains hardware/ and firmware subdirectories.
Macfuse: Fuse For Macbook Pro
$ ls -F /proc/hardware cpus/ lightsensor/ motionsensor/ mouse/ tpm/ $ ls -F /proc/hardware/cpus 0/ 1/ $ ls -F /proc/hardware/cpus/0 data $ cat /proc/hardware/cpus/0/data slot 0 (master), running type 7, subtype 4 6751211 ticks (user 91036 system 141938 idle 6517257 nice 980) cpu uptime 18h 45m 12s In particular, if the machine has a or an, you can retrieve 'live' readings from these devices through procfs files. $ cat /proc/hardware/motionsensor/data -7 -1 0 $ cat /proc/hardware/motionsensor/data -37 -1 0 $ cat /proc/hardware/lightsensor/data 839 895 $ cat /proc/hardware/lightsensor/data 49 893 Compatibility Although there's no universal standard for either the hierarchy of file system objects in procfs or the contents of these objects, some implementations are rather popular because of the prevalence of their underlying operating systems. For example, FreeBSD contains linprocfs, a process file system that emulates a subset of Linux procfs. Linprocfs was necessary for Linux binary emulation to work completely.
This procfs implementation doesn't attempt to conform to any other implementation. For somebody with enough determination and time, it could be an interesting project to create a Linux-compatible (or Solaris-compatible, or whatever) version of MacFUSE-based procfs for Mac OS X. More Reading.